Tue, Jul 9, 2024
Data
Why is Address Quality Still Appalling in 2024?
Despite the longstanding emphasis on database quality, address quality remains problematic in 2024 due to a combination of technical, organisational, and practical challenges. Here are some key reasons:
Data Entry Errors
Human Error: Manual data entry is prone to mistakes. Typos, misinterpretations, and incomplete information are common issues.
Inconsistent Formats: Addresses can be entered in various formats, leading to inconsistencies and difficulties in standardisation.
Data Decay
Frequent Changes: People and businesses frequently move, leading to outdated addresses. Keeping up with these changes is challenging.
Lack of Updates: Not all address changes are reported promptly, and databases can become outdated quickly.
Integration Issues
Multiple Data Sources: Companies often collect data from various sources, including online forms, customer service interactions, and third-party vendors. Integrating these sources can lead to inconsistencies.
Legacy Systems: Many organisations use outdated systems that are not equipped to handle modern data quality techniques.
Lack of Standardisation
Global Variation: Address formats vary widely across different countries and regions, making standardisation difficult.
Incomplete Standards: Even within countries, there might not be a universally accepted standard for address formats.
Technological Limitations
Insufficient Tools: Despite advancements, tools for address verification and standardisation are not foolproof and can miss errors.
Complexity of AI: While AI and machine learning have improved data quality processes, they are not perfect and can struggle with complex or nuanced data.
Organisational Challenges
Resource Constraints: Data quality initiatives require investment in tools, training, and personnel, which some organisations might not prioritize.
Siloed Data: Different departments may manage their own data, leading to inconsistencies and lack of a unified approach to address quality.
User Behavior
Reluctance to Share Information: Users might be reluctant to provide complete or accurate information due to privacy concerns or apathy.
Intentional Misinformation: Some users might intentionally provide incorrect information to avoid spam or for other reasons.
Evolving Landscapes
Urban Development: New developments, changes in postal codes, and re-zoning can quickly make existing address data obsolete.
Natural Disasters and Political Changes: Events like natural disasters or changes in political boundaries can rapidly alter address landscapes.
Data Privacy Regulations
Compliance Issues: Ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR can complicate data collection and maintenance processes.
Limitations on Data Sharing: Privacy regulations can limit the ability to share and verify address data across organisations.
Vendor Reliability
Quality of Third-party Data: Dependence on third-party vendors for address data can be risky if those vendors do not maintain high data quality standards.
Address quality is a multifaceted issue that requires continuous effort and investment in technology, processes, and people. Despite progress in database marketing and data quality tools, the inherent complexities of address data and the dynamic nature of the real world mean that maintaining high address quality is an ongoing challenge.
By Jason Boxall, Director at Pro-Active
Pro-Active’s success has been based upon a culture of expertise, knowledge sharing and recruiting professionals with fresh thinking business tactics. Our broad mix of exceptional talent in our Online, E-Commerce & Mailing / Print teams enable you to achieve the very best results from data driven campaigns.